In a controversial development, President Donald Trump has reportedly directed Homeland Security to authorize Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to use “whatever means necessary” to handle protests during operations at California cannabis farms. The directive has sparked widespread debate over the balance between law enforcement authority and protesters’ rights.

According to sources familiar with the matter, the order was issued amid escalating tensions surrounding federal efforts to regulate illegal cannabis cultivation and the protests that have emerged in response. Trump’s directive emphasizes a zero-tolerance approach, giving ICE agents broad discretion in the field to manage demonstrations, including the use of force if deemed necessary.

Critics have condemned the decision, arguing that it risks escalating violence and undermines civil liberties. “Empowering agents with such vague and aggressive language raises serious concerns about the potential for abuse and disproportionate responses,” said a human rights advocate. “Protesting is a fundamental part of democracy, and authorities should prioritize de-escalation over force.”

Supporters, however, argue that the move is essential to maintaining law and order in areas where illegal activities, such as unlicensed cannabis farms, threaten community safety and economic stability. They contend that aggressive enforcement is necessary to combat the illegal drug trade and protect legitimate businesses and residents.