The WNBA is no stranger to fierce rivalries and emotional tension — but this time, the battle isn’t on the court… it’s on the pages of a book.

DiJonai Carrington, one of the league’s most outspoken and dynamic stars, is reportedly furious and preparing legal action against veteran journalist Christine Brennan over explosive claims made in Brennan’s newly released biography about WNBA sensation Caitlin Clark.

What began as a literary tribute has now snowballed into a full-blown controversy, with Carrington at the center — and fans watching with bated breath.

---

 THE BOOK THAT STARTED THE FIRE

Christine Brennan’s book, “Caitlin: The Rise of a Legend”, released just last week, chronicles the meteoric rise of Indiana Fever rookie Caitlin Clark, who has become the most polarizing figure in women’s basketball — a ratings magnet, a cultural phenomenon, and, now, an accidental lightning rod.

But according to early readers — and Carrington’s inner circle — the book doesn’t just highlight Clark’s success.

It names names. Points fingers. And revisits some of the league’s most heated moments.

One chapter allegedly details “tense on-court confrontations” between Clark and opposing players, including Carrington, and hints at “unspoken resentments” from veteran players “struggling with the spotlight shifting.”

---

 DIONAJAI’S REACTION: “THIS IS DEFAMATION.”

Within 24 hours of the book’s launch, DiJonai Carrington took to X (formerly Twitter) with a cryptic but unmistakably pointed post:

“If you’re going to write about me — ask me first. Lies won’t go unanswered.”

Sources close to the Connecticut Sun star say Carrington was blindsided by the chapter, and is exploring legal options for defamation and unauthorized usage of her name and likeness.

“She’s furious. She didn’t give consent. And now she’s being painted as some kind of villain,” said one team insider.
“She feels this book is trying to rewrite the truth — to protect someone else’s image.”

---

 WNBA COMMUNITY REACTS — AND IT’S DIVIDED

Fans and players have quickly taken sides.

Some are rallying behind Carrington, praising her for standing up for herself and challenging biased media portrayals that they claim are overprotective of Clark.

“Tired of the Black women being made out as the angry ones.”

“DiJonai has a right to defend her name.”

“Why are we throwing players under the bus to sell a book?”

Others are defending Brennan’s journalistic freedom, claiming the book merely documents existing footage, quotes, and moments already in the public eye.

“If it happened on national TV, it’s fair game.”

“She’s not the villain. She’s part of the story.”

---

 WHAT’S REALLY IN THE BOOK?

While Brennan and her publisher have not released a full comment, early copies obtained by reviewers confirm:

Descriptions of “emotional aggression” from players during Caitlin Clark’s rookie year

A section that highlights Carrington’s now-viral stare-down after a flagrant foul

Allegations of locker room gossip and media-fueled resentment between “older stars” and “new favorites”

Nowhere does Brennan name Carrington as “jealous” or “bitter,” but the implications are clear, say her legal team.

“It doesn’t have to say it outright. It’s how it’s framed,” one legal source noted.

---

 LEGAL SHOWDOWN LOOMING?

Carrington’s representatives have reportedly sent a formal cease-and-desist letter to Brennan’s publisher, demanding:

Immediate clarification in future editions

A public statement of correction

And a halt on promotional content that uses Carrington’s name or image without approval

If ignored, a lawsuit may follow, making this the first major legal clash in modern WNBA history over media portrayal.

---

 THE BIGGER CONVERSATION

At its core, this isn’t just about one player, one author, or one book.

It’s about control of the narrative.

DiJonai Carrington has long been a vocal advocate for equity, representation, and media accountability in women’s sports. Many believe this fight could set a new precedent — forcing sports journalists to rethink how they tell stories that involve real athletes, real lives, and real reputations.

---

 FINAL WORD: A BATTLE OFF THE COURT

Christine Brennan wanted to celebrate a rising icon.

But in doing so, she may have ignited a battle far bigger than basketball — one that now questions truth, ownership, and the unseen tension pulsing beneath the league’s glamorous surface.

As for Carrington?

She’s not backing down.
She’s not staying silent.
And this time, the fight is for her name

DiJonai Carrington Calls ‘Defamation of Character’ on Caitlin Clark Book Author

Dallas Wings guard DiJonai Carrington made a strong claim about an excerpt reporter Christine Brennan has published on July 6.

In September 2024, USA Today reporter Christine Brennan caused a lot of controversy for asking WNBA guard DiJonai Carrington whether she had intentionally poked Indiana Fever star guard Caitlin Clark in the eye during a playoff game.

“DiJonai, when you went and kind of swatted at Caitlin, did you intend to hit her in the eye, and if so—or if not, either way—could you talk about what happened on that play?” Brennan asked.

“I don’t even know why I would intend to hit anybody in the eye. That doesn’t even make sense to me. But no, I didn’t. I didn’t know I hit her, actually. I was trying to make a play on the ball and I guess I followed through and I hit her, so obviously it’s never intentional, that’s not even, like, the type of player that I am,” Carrington responded.

Brennan is the author of ‘On Her Game: Caitlin Clark and the Revolution in Women’s Sports’, which releases on July 9. CNN published a July 6 article that includes an excerpt from this book, which includes Brennan’s writing about the aftermath of this interaction, including a confrontation between her and NaLyssa Smith, with whom Carrington is in a relationship.

“Indianapolis Fieldhouse Files Fever beat writer Scott Agness, Indianapolis Star Fever beat writer Chloe Peterson, and I were in the otherwise empty catering area, waiting for the Fever shootaround to end on the court nearby, when Carrington surprised us with her appearance between the curtains,” the excerpt wrote.

“’Why are you talking shit about NaLyssa?’ she blurted out loudly, referring to her partner, NaLyssa Smith, the Fever forward.

“The question surprised the three of us because no one was saying anything personal or derogatory about Smith… ‘You’re saying she’s a bad teammate!’ Carrington yelled,” it continued.

“Then [Carrington] looked specifically at me. ‘I walked past and I heard you talking shit about NaLyssa! It was you, out of your mouth!’”

It seems that Carrington has caught wind of this excerpt, which is shown by two X posts she made hours after it was published

“,” was Carrington’s first post.

She then added, “defamation of character atp ”.

Making a defamation of character claim is extremely serious, given the legal implications. And while an X post is a far cry from actually taking someone to court, it’s clear that Carrington is not happy about this part of the book